The Filecoin Mining Pyramid Scheme starkly exposes the precarious underbelly of decentralized physical infrastructure networks (DePIN), where Filecoin’s (FIL) innovative proof-of-replication storage model—intended to democratize data preservation via IPFS—has been cynically hijacked by fraudsters to perpetuate classic Ponzi mechanics. In late 2023, Chinese authorities dismantled a Shenzhen-based operation that lured thousands of retail investors with fabricated promises of 20-50% monthly yields from FIL mining hardware and staking, only to recycle funds through relentless recruitment rather than genuine network contributions, resulting in estimated losses of $10-50 million laundered via chain hops to USDT on TRON, P2P OTC trades, and mixer obfuscation. This case, amplified by the U.S. SEC’s 2024 Binance lawsuit branding FIL an unregistered security alongside AXS and ATOM, underscores systemic AML vulnerabilities in permissionless ecosystems: lax KYC on exchanges like Binance and KuCoin enabled cross-border flows, while Protocol Labs’ non-involvement belies broader regulatory ambiguity under the Howey Test for utility tokens. Amid Chainalysis-reported $45B global illicit crypto volumes in 2025, Filecoin’s minor footprint signals medium risk but warns of DePIN’s scalability pitfalls—overhyped tokenomics fueling speculative scams that erode investor trust and invite intensified FATF-compliant scrutiny, potentially stifling legitimate blockchain storage adoption in an era of post-Trump SEC retrenchment.​​
The Filecoin Mining Pyramid Scheme, uncovered in late 2023 by Chinese authorities, exemplifies vulnerabilities in decentralized storage networks like Filecoin (FIL), where fraudsters masqueraded legitimate mining operations as high-yield investments. A Shenzhen-based firm enticed thousands of retail investors with promises of 20-50% monthly returns from FIL staking and proof-of-replication mining, leveraging Filecoin’s 2021 price surge hype. Investors purchased overpriced hardware and FIL tokens via platforms like Binance, only to see funds funneled into a classic Ponzi structure reliant on new recruits rather than actual storage deals on the IPFS-powered network. Chinese public security bureaus raided operations, arresting executives and seizing assets amid Beijing’s 2021 crypto ban, classifying it under Criminal Law Article 192 for illegal fundraising.