First Abu Dhabi Bank PJSC (FAB)​

🔴 High Risk

First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB) stands as the United Arab Emirates’ largest financial institution by assets, headquartered at first abu dhabi bank (fab) al qurm business park abu dhabi, with extensive operations under first abu dhabi bank (fab) head office oversight across branches like first abu dhabi bank (fab) corniche branch abu dhabi, first abu dhabi bank (fab) abu baker al siddique branch, first abu dhabi bank (fab) bur dubai branch dubai, and international outposts including first abu dhabi bank (fab) france address, first abu dhabi bank fab london, and first abu dhabi bank fab geneva.

Formed in 2017 through the merger of National Bank of Abu Dhabi and First Gulf Bank, first abu dhabi bank (fab) year of establishment marks a pivotal expansion in first abu dhabi bank (fab) uae dominance, serving first abu dhabi bank (fab) careers seekers and clients via first abu dhabi bank fab ajman branch, first abu dhabi bank (fab) dubai mall branch, and more.​

This case gains significance in the global Anti–Money Laundering (AML) landscape due to First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB)’s entanglement in a major regulatory obstruction penalty from Qatar’s Financial Centre Regulatory Authority (QFCRA), raising flags on first abu dhabi bank (fab) Fraud, first abu dhabi bank (fab) Shell company risks, and Politically Exposed Person (PEP) exposure via first abu dhabi bank fab owner structures tied to Abu Dhabi’s ruling family and Mubadala.

Amid UAE’s evolving Customer Due Diligence (CDD) and Know Your Customer (KYC) scrutiny, first abu dhabi bank fab ceo Hana Al Rostamani’s leadership faces tests in upholding first abu dhabi bank values against Suspicious Transaction shadows.​

Background and Context

First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB)’s ascent reflects Abu Dhabi’s sovereign wealth ambitions, with first abu dhabi bank fab investor relations disclosing first abu dhabi bank (fab) total assets exceeding AED 1 trillion and first abu dhabi bank fab revenue streams from first abu dhabi bank (fab) net worth bolstering first abu dhabi bank stock on the Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange.

First abu dhabi bank history traces to pre-merger entities, evolving into a powerhouse with branches like first abu dhabi bank (fab) deira city centre branch dubai, first abu dhabi bank (fab) mirdif city centre branch dubai, first abu dhabi bank fab etihad branch, and regional extensions in first abu dhabi bank fab egypt, first abu dhabi bank fab ksa, and first abu dhabi bank (fab) kuwait.​

The controversy timeline ignited in 2018 amid Qatar-UAE tensions, when QFCRA probed First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB)’s Qatar branch for suspected manipulation of the Qatari riyal and government securities—potential vectors for first abu dhabi bank (fab) Structuring or Linked Transactions via Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) flows.

First abu dhabi bank fab annual report and first abu dhabi bank (fab) financial statements later emphasized compliance, but initial non-cooperation exposed Corporate Governance frailties, culminating in a QAR 200 million (USD 55 million) fine by 2019. This unfolded against UAE Central Bank’s AML crackdowns, mirroring risks at sites like first abu dhabi bank fab fujairah branch and first abu dhabi bank (fab) ras al khaimah corniche branch.​

Mechanisms and Laundering Channels

While no court has confirmed outright Money Laundering by First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB), the QFCRA case spotlights obstruction as a facilitator of opacity, potentially enabling Trade-Based Laundering or Hybrid Money Laundering through unreported trades in Qatari instruments.

First abu dhabi bank (fab) Offshore entity risks arise from cross-border operations, including first abu dhabi bank fab hong kong address, first abu dhabi bank fab india, and US branches facing OCC penalties, where Name Screening lapses could mask Beneficial Ownership in Cash-Intensive Business flows.​

First abu dhabi bank (fab) Shell company allegations remain inferential, tied to state-linked holdings like Mubadala’s 37.9% stake rather than named shells, yet first abu dhabi bank fab shareholder opacity via ruling family’s 17.8% invites PEP scrutiny under FATF standards.

Branches such as first abu dhabi bank (fab) jebel ali branch, first abu dhabi bank fab khorfakkan branch sharjah, and first abu dhabi bank (fab) mall of the emirates branch handle high-volume EFT that demand robust CDD to prevent Structuring. No direct first abu dhabi bank (fab) Forced Liquidation or Overinvoicing evidence surfaces, but regulatory stonewalling echoes classic laundering_methods red flags.​

QFCRA’s 2019 penalty targeted First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB) for breaching Principles 1 (integrity), 13 (cooperation), and Article 57 (obstruction), after FAB withheld trading records despite court orders— a direct hit to Financial Transparency. The USD 55 million fine, enforced via 2020 New York proceedings, underscores cross-jurisdictional pursuit. US OCC imposed a civil penalty on first abu dhabi bank USA branch, signaling KYC gaps.​

UAE’s Central Bank, amid fines like AED 3 million for AML breaches at peers, enforces CAB/ML laws aligned with FATF’s Beneficial Ownership directives, pressuring first abu dhabi bank fab glassdoor-reviewed compliance teams. First abu dhabi bank (fab) jobs postings now stress AML vigilance, reflecting QFCRA’s ongoing manipulation probe and branch restrictions.​

Financial Transparency and Global Accountability

The First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB) saga exposed Financial Transparency chasms in state-influenced banks, where PEP ties via first abu dhabi bank fab owner Mubadala hinder scrutiny. International regulators like QFCRA and OCC demanded accountability, spurring first abu dhabi bank fab infinite travel card issuer to enhance reporting under FATF Recommendation 10 (CDD).​

Global watchdogs, including BankTrack, flagged first abu dhabi bank (fab) Politically exposed person (PEP) risks, prompting cross-border data-sharing reforms. Anti–Money Laundering (AML) lessons from first abu dhabi bank (fab) address operations in first abu dhabi bank (fab) elite centre – business park underscore needs for unified Name Screening protocols, influencing UAE’s FATF grey-list exit efforts.​

Economic and Reputational Impact

First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB) absorbed the QAR 200 million hit without derailing first abu dhabi bank fab revenue, yet first abu dhabi bank stock volatility and partnership strains emerged post-QFCRA action. Reputational dents affected first abu dhabi bank (fab) careers appeal on first abu dhabi bank fab glassdoor, while investor trust waned amid first abu dhabi bank (fab) worth queries.​

Broader ripples hit UAE’s financial hub status, eroding confidence in branches like first abu dhabi bank (fab) palm jumeirah mall branch dubai, first abu dhabi bank fab nakheel mall branch dubai, and first abu dhabi bank (fab) rolex tower branch, amplifying calls for first abu dhabi bank (fab) salam street branch oversight.​

Governance and Compliance Lessons

Corporate Governance lapses at First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB)—evident in prolonged document withholding—highlight audit failures under first abu dhabi bank fab hana al rostamani. First abu dhabi bank (fab) Financial Crime Compliance Program now prioritizes KYC and monitoring, addressing first abu dhabi bank (fab) Suspicious transaction vulnerabilities at sites like first abu dhabi bank fab islamic fujairah branch.​

Regulators mandated reforms, including fitness-and-propriety checks, yielding stronger internal controls and first abu dhabi bank fab one tower branch training.​

Legacy and Industry Implications

First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB)’s case reshaped Anti–Money Laundering (AML) enforcement in MENA, catalyzing UAE’s compliance upgrades and global scrutiny of PEP-linked banks. It pioneered obstruction penalties as laundering proxies, influencing first abu dhabi bank (fab) ghayathi branch protocols and sector-wide CDD.​

The episode elevated Financial Transparency benchmarks, impacting peers via enhanced Name Screening and cross-border cooperation.​

First Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB)’s QFCRA obstruction fine and US penalties reveal Corporate Governance risks in PEP-entwined giants, demanding vigilant Anti–Money Laundering (AML) frameworks. Core lessons affirm Financial Transparency and Beneficial Ownership disclosure as safeguards for first abu dhabi bank (fab) uae integrity and global finance.​

Country of Incorporation

United Arab Emirates (incorporated and listed in Abu Dhabi)​

  • Headquarters: Al Qurm – Business Park, P.O. Box 6316, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates​

  • Operating footprint:

    • Core operations in the UAE across retail, corporate, investment, and private banking​

    • Regional presence across MENA (including Egypt and Saudi Arabia) plus select hubs in Europe, Asia, and the US through branches/subsidiaries​

  • Sector: Financial services / Banking​

  • Industry segments:

    • Corporate and investment banking

    • Commercial and SME banking

    • Retail/consumer banking

    • Private banking and wealth management​

    • Type:

      • Publicly listed commercial bank on Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange (ADX)​

    • Ownership/control profile:

      • Mubadala Investment Company, via its wholly owned vehicle One Hundred and Fifteenth Investment Company – Sole Proprietorship LLC, holds about 37.9% (strategic state shareholding of Emirate of Abu Dhabi)​

      • Abu Dhabi ruling family collectively holds about 17.8%​

      • Remaining shares held by other UAE entities and public investors (free float)​

    • Structural risk notes:

      • De facto state-linked institution with significant sovereign and ruling family influence, giving it systemic importance in the UAE financial system​

    • (Actual laundering has not been judicially established; mechanisms below are inferred risk vectors based on enforcement records and allegations rather than proven criminal convictions.)

      • Market manipulation / abusive trading risk:

        • QFCRA investigated suspected manipulation of the Qatari riyal, Qatari government securities, and related instruments by FAB’s Qatar branch; FAB was sanctioned for obstructing the investigation, not for a concluded finding of manipulation at this stage.​

      • Regulatory obstruction / opacity as a laundering enabler:

        • FAB failed over a prolonged period to provide trading records and related documentation requested by QFCRA, prompting a QAR 200 million (approx. USD 55 million) penalty for obstruction and lack of cooperation.​

        • Such non‑cooperation and poor transparency are classic red‑flag conditions for potential market abuse and laundering of proceeds through capital markets.

      • AML controls weaknesses (inferred):

        • UAE authorities have disclosed AML enforcement actions against UAE banks for failure to meet CBUAE AML/CFT standards; one such Dh3 million penalty to a UAE bank in 2025 cites breaches of AML rules, consistent with the broader risk context FAB operates in, though the Central Bank did not name FAB in that specific notice.​

        • FAB’s need to publicly emphasise its “Financial Crime Compliance Program” points to remediation of previously identified control gaps in KYC, monitoring, and sanctions screening.​

  • Major/state owners:

    • Mubadala Investment Company (via One Hundred and Fifteenth Investment Company – Sole Proprietorship LLC): approx. 37.9%​

    • Abu Dhabi ruling family (aggregated holdings): approx. 17.8%​

  • Key individuals:

    • Group CEO: Hana Al Rostamani (first female CEO of the bank, leading post‑merger FAB)​

    • Key shareholder representative: Mubadala is a wholly owned strategic investment arm of the Government of Abu Dhabi, overseen by senior members of the ruling elite​

  • Control implications:

    • Effective control lies with Abu Dhabi’s sovereign wealth and ruling family nexus, giving the bank political backing and embedding it in state economic policy.

  • Yes (indirect).

    • The Abu Dhabi ruling family’s collective 17.8% stake constitutes exposure to politically exposed persons.​

    • Mubadala, as a sovereign wealth vehicle of Abu Dhabi, is ultimately controlled by senior political figures of the emirate, further strengthening PEP links at ownership level.​

    • Public leaks:

      • No direct, widely cited inclusion of FAB as a named core entity in Panama Papers or FinCEN Files has been reported in leading leak databases; references to FAB tend to appear in broader discussions about UAE as a secrecy and capital‑flight hub rather than as a singled‑out leak entity.​

    • Formal investigations and actions:

      • QFCRA market manipulation investigation (Qatar riyal and Qatari government instruments) – FAB sanctioned for obstruction and lack of cooperation.​

      • Related civil proceedings in New York initiated by QFCRA to enforce the USD 55 million penalty.​

  • Entity‑level assessment (contextual):

    • FAB is the largest bank in the UAE with systemic importance, deeply intertwined with state and ruling family structures, operating from a jurisdiction classified as high‑risk for money laundering and sanctions‑evasion flows by many international observers.​

  • Suggested qualitative rating for database:

    • High – due to:

      • State/PEP‑linked ownership

      • Operation from a regional financial secrecy and sanctions‑evading hub

      • Obstruction‑related fine concerning an investigation into market manipulation​

  • Qatar Financial Centre Regulatory Authority (QFCRA):

    • 2019: Financial penalty of QAR 200,000,000 (approx. USD 54–55 million) on FAB for obstructing an investigation into suspected manipulation of the Qatari riyal, Qatari government securities, and related instruments.​

    • Grounds:

      • Obstructing QFCRA in the exercise of its functions (Article 57 Financial Services Regulations).

      • Failure to observe high standard of integrity in conduct of business (Principle 1, General Rules).

      • Failure to deal with regulator in an open and cooperative manner (Principle 13, General Rules).​

    • Supervisory notices restricting activities of FAB’s QFC branch due to fitness and probity concerns and non‑compliance with court orders.​

    • QFCRA noted that the market‑manipulation investigation continues and that further disciplinary action could follow.​

  • Civil enforcement of Qatari penalty:

    • 2020: QFCRA initiated legal proceedings in New York to compel FAB to pay the USD 55 million financial penalty pursuant to the Qatari court judgment.​

  • US regulatory context (FAB’s US branch):

    • The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) lists a civil money penalty matter for “First Abu Dhabi Bank USA, N.V., Washington D.C., a federal branch of First Abu Dhabi Bank,” indicating a US enforcement action; the PDF heading confirms a civil penalty, though the detailed amount and AML specifics require the full document.​

  • Other UAE/MENA supervisory environment:

    • UAE Central Bank has publicly tightened AML/CFT enforcement, issuing multiple fines on banks and exchange houses for AML deficiencies, providing the regulatory backdrop in which FAB operates.​

  • Active – fully operational as the UAE’s largest bank with over AED 1 trillion in assets and approximately 6,600 employees as of 2021.​

  • Subject to past and ongoing regulatory scrutiny in Qatar and potentially in the US, but not under a blanket international sanctions regime.​

  • April 2017: FAB created via merger of National Bank of Abu Dhabi (NBAD) and First Gulf Bank (FGB), becoming the UAE’s largest bank by assets.​

  • March 2018: QFCRA opens investigation into suspected manipulation by FAB of the Qatari riyal and Qatari government securities; FAB is required to provide trading records and related documentation.​

  • July 2018: QFCRA applies to Qatar Financial Centre Civil and Commercial Court to compel FAB to produce documents after non‑compliance.​

  • November 2018: Court of First Instance orders FAB to comply with production requirements; FAB still fails to fully comply, constituting obstruction.​

  • August 2019: QFCRA announces a QAR 200 million (USD ~55m) penalty on FAB for obstruction and lack of cooperation in the ongoing market‑manipulation investigation.​

  • 2019–2020: QFCRA issues supervisory notices restricting FAB’s QFC branch activities due to fitness and probity concerns and non‑compliance with court orders.​

  • November 2020: QFCRA starts legal proceedings in New York to enforce the USD 55 million penalty, seeking to compel FAB to pay the Qatari judgment.​

  • 2020s (US): OCC records a civil money penalty case involving First Abu Dhabi Bank USA, N.V., indicating regulatory action against FAB’s US federal branch.​

  • 2020s (UAE & region): Increasingly stringent AML/CFT enforcement in UAE free zones and onshore, with multiple fines against financial firms for AML failures, forming the environment in which FAB operates and remediates its controls.​

  • Market abuse / market manipulation risk

  • Regulatory obstruction / non‑cooperation

  • Potential layering and placement through large cross‑border capital markets activity (inferred risk)

  • MENA (primary)

  • Cross‑border operations (US, Europe, Asia)

  • High‑risk institution (state‑linked, operating from a high‑risk financial secrecy and sanctions‑evasion hub; subject to major obstruction penalty)

First Abu Dhabi Bank PJSC (FAB) ​

First Abu Dhabi Bank PJSC (FAB)
Country of Registration:
United Arab Emirates
Headquarters:
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates ​
Jurisdiction Risk:
High
Industry/Sector:
Banking and financial services (corporate and investment banking, commercial/SME banking, retail banking, private banking and wealth management). ​
Laundering Method Used:

No court‑proven laundering scheme, but red‑flag risk vectors include: obstruction of a market‑manipulation investigation into trading in Qatari riyal and government securities; non‑cooperation and opacity toward regulators; heightened AML risk from large cross‑border capital markets activity in a secrecy‑prone jurisdiction.
​

Linked Individuals:

– Major owner: Mubadala Investment Company (via One Hundred and Fifteenth Investment Company – Sole Proprietorship LLC), c. 37.9% stake, ultimately controlled by the Government of Abu Dhabi (PEP exposure).
– Abu Dhabi ruling family: aggregated holding c. 17.8% (direct PEP nexus).
– Group CEO: Hana Al Rostamani, leading the merged FAB group.​

Known Shell Companies:

No specific named shell companies publicly and directly linked to FAB’s enforcement cases identified in open sources; exposure is primarily via its own branches and state‑linked ownership rather than classic shell structures.​

Offshore Links:
1
Estimated Amount Laundered:
Not established; the only quantified figure is a QAR 200 million (≈ USD 55 million) regulatory penalty for obstruction of a market‑abuse investigation, not a judicially confirmed laundered amount. ​
AML Network Risk Rating:
🔴 High Risk
Quick Links:
Popular Pages:
Disclaimer & Legal:
Facebook-f Twitter Youtube Pinterest-p Instagram Tiktok
© 2025 AML Network. – All Rights Reserved.