Tether

đź”´ High Risk

Tether, a cryptocurrency stablecoin pegged to the US dollar and registered in the British Virgin Islands, has increasingly become a focal point in global money laundering investigations. Despite its widespread use as a purportedly stable digital currency, Tether’s operational practices have drawn severe criticism for facilitating illicit financial flows. Investigations and regulatory findings reveal that Tether has historically failed to fully back its tokens with fiat reserves and has commingled these reserves with Bitfinex’s operational funds, creating significant opacity. The anonymity afforded by its offshore British Virgin Islands registration, combined with its widespread use on blockchains like Tron, has made Tether a preferred vehicle for laundering billions in illicit proceeds globally, including funds linked to human trafficking, fraud, and cybercrime. While Tether has taken some steps towards compliance and cooperation with law enforcement, lapses such as delayed fund freezing and unregulated third-party involvement underscore persistent vulnerabilities exploited by criminal networks, especially notable within the British Virgin Islands’ lax regulatory milieu. This case highlights critical gaps in cryptocurrency oversight and exposes Tether’s dual role as both a legitimate financial tool and a conduit for global money laundering.​

Tether, a cryptocurrency stablecoin issuer incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, has been at the center of global money laundering controversies due to its USDT token’s widespread illicit use. The company’s structural practices, including partial backing of reserves, commingling funds with the Bitfinex exchange, and reliance on unregulated third-party entities, have facilitated the laundering of billions globally. Offshore registration in the British Virgin Islands has provided Tether with regulatory advantages, allowing opacity that criminals exploit for hiding and transferring illicit proceeds via digital assets. Despite enforcement actions, millions of dollars linked to terrorism and organized crime continue to flow through Tether’s network, underscoring ongoing AML challenges. The case exemplifies the complex intersection of cryptocurrency, offshore regulation, and global illicit finance, revealing gaps in oversight particularly pronounced in the British Virgin Islands jurisdiction and impacting global AML frameworks.​

Countries Involved

British Virgin Islands, United States, China, and other global jurisdictions

Various dates, notably 2016-2018 (reserve backing issues reported in 2025), with ongoing reports and enforcement actions through 2024-2025

Tether (USDT)

Money laundering, financial misrepresentation, illicit asset transfers, and enabling cybercrime proceeds

Tether Limited (registered in the British Virgin Islands), Bitfinex exchange, various unregulated third parties and shell entities, organized crime networks, illicit gambling operations, and terrorist organizations

No direct public confirmation of PEP involvement; however, due to complex global networks, indirect exposure is possible through layered transactions

The major laundering methods identified include the use of Tether’s stablecoin as a medium to convert illicit funds into digital assets for rapid transfers, commingling of reserve funds with operational accounts to obscure tracking, leveraging unregulated offshore entities including those in the British Virgin Islands for fund storage, exploiting cryptocurrency platforms and illegal online gambling businesses to funnel proceeds, and employing encrypted messaging apps like Telegram to recruit money mules who open accounts on crypto exchanges for layering transactions

Multibillion-dollar scale globally; notably a $1.7 billion laundering network dismantled in China in 2022, and $5.6 billion in a separate case. $225 million in illicit funds were voluntarily frozen by Tether in a DOJ-led investigation for suspected links to human trafficking and scam operations

Tether’s USDT serves as a preferred vehicle for laundering due to its pegging to the US dollar, transactional speed, anonymity on certain blockchains (e.g., Tron), low fees, and ease of use in converting cash into cryptocurrency and vice versa. Reports show Tether failed to maintain full fiat backing for all issued tokens, blending reserves with Bitfinex funds, obscuring audit trails. Illicit actors leveraged Tether to evade regulatory scrutiny by transferring funds through multiple jurisdictions, often routing through entities registered in the British Virgin Islands, a known offshore financial haven exploited for secrecy and limited regulatory oversight. In delayed responses (e.g., nearly two days to freeze funds on FBI request), Tether’s operational responsiveness hindered anti-money laundering efforts

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission in the US fined Tether $41 million in 2025 for misrepresenting reserve backing and failure to conduct professional audits. Law enforcement dismantled massive laundering networks relying on Tether in Asia. The US Department of Justice also secured seizures linked to human trafficking and scam-related funds. Despite its BVI registration, international law enforcement action focused mainly on Tether’s parent operations and associated exchanges. Tether has at times intervened to freeze suspicious accounts voluntarily. However, criticism remains over systemic vulnerabilities in the entity’s structure and oversight, especially concerning BVI’s lax regulatory environment enabling anonymity and delayed enforcement responses

Tether
Case Title / Operation Name:
The Tether Money Laundering Controversies in the British Virgin Islands and Global Context
Country(s) Involved:
China, United States
Platform / Exchange Used:
Tether Limited (BVI), Bitfinex, Binance, TRON
Cryptocurrency Involved:

Tether (USDT)

Volume Laundered (USD est.):
Over $5.6 billion in major uncovered cases; $300 million frozen by T3 Financial Crime Unit since 2024
Wallet Addresses / TxIDs :
Multiple wallet addresses associated with illicit USDT transactions across blockchains including Tron
Method of Laundering:

Use of stablecoin transfers, commingling of reserves, layering via offshore entities, exploiting unregulated exchanges, recruiting mules via encrypted apps

Source of Funds:

Human trafficking, cyber scams, romance scams, organized crime, darknet markets, illegal gambling

Associated Shell Companies:

Various unregulated offshore entities in the British Virgin Islands and elsewhere

PEPs or Individuals Involved:

No direct public confirmation; indirect exposure possible due to complex global networks

Law Enforcement / Regulatory Action:
Fines by CFTC ($41 million), multiple global law enforcement seizures, freezing of illicit assets by T3 FCU, DOJ investigations
Year of Occurrence:
2016-2025, with intensified actions in 2021-2025
Ongoing Case:
Ongoing
đź”´ High Risk