Limited Liability Company Kvazar is a Russian company that has attracted international scrutiny because of its role in a cross-border electronics-procurement network and its designation by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, commonly known as OFAC. Registered in Saint Petersburg, the company is also known as Kvazar OOO or ООО «КВАЗАР». Its registration number is 1197847145748, and its tax ID is 7805753313. Russian corporate records indicate that the company was incorporated on June 25, 2019.
Limited Liability Company Kvazar is relevant to discussions about Money Laundering, Financial Transparency, Beneficial Ownership, Offshore Companies, Anti-Money Laundering (AML), and Global Accountability. Nevertheless, the available public record requires careful interpretation. OFAC designated Limited Liability Company Kvazar for operating in Russia’s electronics sector and identified it as an importer of U.S.-manufactured electronic components. That designation does not, by itself, constitute a criminal conviction for money laundering.
The public evidence supports classifying Limited Liability Company Kvazar as a sanctions-evasion and illicit-procurement risk entity. It does not conclusively establish that the company laundered criminal proceeds, concealed luxury assets, operated through an offshore company, or belonged to a proven criminal network. Its significance comes from the combination of unclear ownership information, international supply-chain connections, and access to foreign-manufactured electronics.
This Limited Liability Company Kvazar company profile examines the company’s corporate details, business activities, sanctions history, ownership questions, and possible exposure to money-laundering typologies. Confirmed facts are separated from allegations and unresolved investigative questions.
Formation and Corporate Structure
Limited Liability Company Kvazar was formed in Russia on June 25, 2019. Its jurisdiction of registration is the Russian Federation, and its registered address is Ulitsa Promyshlennaya, Building 19, Letter R, Office 304, Saint Petersburg, Russia, 198095. The address is located in a commercial and industrial area of Saint Petersburg. Public sources do not establish the size of the company’s premises, its warehouse capacity, its number of employees, or whether it maintained infrastructure proportionate to its reported business activities.
The company’s Limited Liability Company Kvazar legal name is Общество с ограниченной ответственностью «КВАЗАР». It is commonly transliterated as Kvazar OOO or OOO Kvazar. Its corporate registration number is 1197847145748, while its Russian tax ID is 7805753313. Public business records report registered capital of approximately RUB 1 million.
Russian company information identifies Vadim Mikhailovich Khramov as the general director of Limited Liability Company Kvazar. The available records also indicate a single-founder or single-shareholder structure. However, the sources reviewed do not reliably identify the ultimate beneficial owner. This distinction is important because a director may manage a company formally without being the person who ultimately controls or benefits from it.
There is no verified evidence that Vadim Mikhailovich Khramov acted as a nominee, proxy, politically exposed person, or criminal associate. However, the inability to verify Limited Liability Company Kvazar ownership creates a Beneficial Ownership concern. A complete assessment would require Russian registry extracts, shareholder documents, banking records, tax filings, accounting information, and details of related-party transactions.
The available information does not prove that Limited Liability Company Kvazar used multiple corporate layers, nominee shareholders, offshore registration, or trust arrangements. These possibilities should remain investigative questions rather than established facts. Such structures can make it harder to identify the person who controls a company and can be used to move funds, goods, or assets across borders. However, no verified evidence reviewed here confirms that Kvazar used those mechanisms.
Financial Activities and Operations
Limited Liability Company Kvazar appears to have operated in the electronics and industrial-equipment trade. Russian business records list multiple economic-activity codes, while OFAC specifically described Kvazar as an importer of U.S.-manufactured electronic components.
The most important connection in the Limited Liability Company Kvazar background is its relationship with Elmec Trade OÜ. Elmec Trade was registered in Estonia and operated from Tallinn. According to the U.S. Treasury, Elmec Trade shipped U.S.-manufactured electronic components to Limited Liability Company Kvazar. Treasury also identified Limited Liability Company Spetsvoltazh as another Russian recipient of electronics supplied by Elmec Trade.
This structure raised sanctions-compliance concerns because the goods originated in the United States, passed through an Estonian intermediary, and reached a Russian importer. Such arrangements require careful review of the original manufacturer, exporter, distributor, freight provider, payment chain, end-user declaration, and final destination.
Electronics can present elevated trade-based money-laundering and sanctions-evasion risks. Components may be compact, valuable, technically complex, and difficult to evaluate solely through invoices. Red flags in this sector can include inconsistent product descriptions, unexplained intermediaries, unusual price variations, repeated transshipments, circular payments, and trade volumes that appear inconsistent with a company’s staffing or physical infrastructure.
These indicators do not prove misconduct by Limited Liability Company Kvazar. No public transaction records reviewed establish that Kvazar over-invoiced goods, under-invoiced shipments, used phantom cargo, or transferred criminal proceeds. No reliable public figure has been identified for the amount of money received, paid, or moved through Kvazar-related accounts.
A Limited Liability Company Kvazar suspicious activity report assessment would require access to banking records and trade documents. Investigators would need to determine whether payments originated from unrelated third parties, whether prices matched market values, whether Elmec Trade had sufficient commercial substance, and whether the imported components were transferred to Russian defence or military-industrial customers.
On the available evidence, Limited Liability Company Kvazar is best described as a high-risk procurement entity rather than a proven money-laundering vehicle.
Jurisdictions and Global Reach
Limited Liability Company Kvazar is registered in Russia, but its documented supply-chain activity extends to Estonia through Elmec Trade OÜ. The Estonian company was registered at Katusepapi Tn 6-502, Tallinn, Estonia, with registration number 14291975.
The use of an Estonian intermediary does not automatically indicate an Offshore Company or an illicit financial arrangement. Estonia is a European Union member state with formal corporate, customs, and AML obligations. Nevertheless, international trade structures may create regulatory-arbitrage opportunities when different authorities possess separate parts of the transaction record.
A bank may see only the immediate customer. A customs authority may see the exporter and importer. A manufacturer may rely on an intermediary’s end-user declaration. A sanctions authority may later identify the transaction as part of a broader procurement network. These information gaps can allow restricted goods or questionable payments to move across several jurisdictions before the complete pattern becomes visible.
No verified offshore bank account, offshore parent company, trust, foundation, or secrecy-jurisdiction entity has been identified in connection with Limited Liability Company Kvazar. There is also no confirmed evidence that Kvazar owned subsidiaries outside Russia. Its documented international reach should therefore be described as a cross-border procurement connection rather than a proven offshore holding network.
Russia’s wider financial environment adds to the compliance risk. The Financial Action Task Force suspended Russia’s membership in February 2023. That suspension does not mean that every Russian company is involved in illicit finance. It does, however, reinforce the importance of independent verification in cases involving Russian companies, foreign intermediaries, restricted technology, and unclear beneficial ownership.
For sanctions-screening purposes, compliance teams should assess the Limited Liability Company Kvazar address, corporate identifiers, directors, shareholders, suppliers, logistics providers, payment intermediaries, and final customers together. Screening only the immediate buyer may fail to identify a concealed end user or a restricted downstream recipient.
Investigations, Scandals, and Public Exposure
The main public exposure involving Limited Liability Company Kvazar is its designation by OFAC on May 19, 2023. The designation formed part of a broader U.S. sanctions action targeting Russian circumvention and evasion networks, military-industrial supply chains, and access to foreign technology.
The Treasury described Elmec Trade as having shipped millions of dollars’ worth of electronics to Russia after the beginning of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Treasury stated that U.S.-manufactured electronics were supplied to Limited Liability Company Kvazar and Limited Liability Company Spetsvoltazh.
This action is central to the Limited Liability Company Kvazar OFAC sanctions record and to its classification as a Limited Liability Company Kvazar sanctioned entity. It also explains why the company appears in sanctions-screening databases and why financial institutions may treat it as a prohibited or extremely high-risk counterparty.
No confirmed Panama Papers, Paradise Papers, Pandora Papers, FinCEN Files, or Suisse Secrets record involving Limited Liability Company Kvazar was identified in the reviewed material. No verified leak has publicly revealed Kvazar’s hidden bank accounts, clients, luxury assets, or relationships with politically exposed persons.
No named political figure has been reliably established as the company’s beneficial owner or controller. Vadim Mikhailovich Khramov is identified as a corporate director, but the available evidence does not establish that he is a PEP, sanctioned individual, criminal defendant, or political proxy.
The absence of a public leak does not prove that no undisclosed arrangement existed. It simply means that no verified leak-based evidence has been identified. The public case involving Limited Liability Company Kvazar arose through a government sanctions action focused on technology procurement rather than through an offshore-leak investigation or a criminal money-laundering prosecution.
Regulatory and Legal Response
OFAC designated Limited Liability Company Kvazar on May 19, 2023, under the Russia-related EO 14024 program. The company was added to the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List.
The designation generally blocks property and interests in property belonging to Kvazar that are located in the United States, come within U.S. jurisdiction, or are held by U.S. persons. U.S. persons are generally prohibited from conducting transactions with the designated entity unless an authorization or exemption applies.
The designation also creates significant risks for non-U.S. businesses. Banks, exporters, insurers, freight companies, technology suppliers, and financial intermediaries may avoid transactions involving Kvazar because of secondary-sanctions concerns, export-control exposure, correspondent-banking restrictions, and reputational risk.
The Limited Liability Company Kvazar sanctions list status also requires counterparties to examine ownership relationships. Under OFAC’s 50 Percent Rule, entities owned 50 percent or more, directly or indirectly, by one or more blocked persons are generally treated as blocked, even if the entity itself is not separately named.
The action against Kvazar forms part of a wider effort to disrupt Russian procurement networks. Regulators increasingly examine the entire chain, including suppliers, brokers, logistics companies, financial institutions, and end users. Enforcement is difficult when documents and transactions are spread across Russia, Estonia, the United States, and other jurisdictions.
No separate criminal conviction, civil money-laundering judgment, forfeiture order, or public indictment against Limited Liability Company Kvazar was identified in the reviewed sources. The OFAC action is a sanctions measure and should not be described as a judicial finding that Kvazar committed Money Laundering.
Economic and Ethical Implications
The economic consequences of Limited Liability Company Kvazar’s case extend beyond one company. If foreign-made electronic components are diverted into restricted markets, sanctions may become less effective and manufacturers may lose control over the end use of their products. Such activity can strengthen restricted industrial supply chains, undermine export controls, and increase compliance costs for legitimate companies.
The case also demonstrates why trade-based financial crime can be difficult to distinguish from ordinary commerce. Importing electronics is a legitimate business activity. A company may lawfully use an overseas distributor, customs broker, logistics provider, or freight forwarder. The same arrangement can also be abused to conceal the final beneficiary, manipulate invoice values, move value between jurisdictions, or disguise a prohibited end use.
This is why the Limited Liability Company Kvazar business information must be assessed through evidence rather than assumptions. A registered company, a modest capital figure, or a commercial address does not automatically prove that Kvazar was a shell company. At the same time, formal registration does not prove that the company had sufficient commercial substance to conduct its reported trade.
The ethical issue involves the boundary between legitimate corporate privacy and illicit concealment. Beneficial Ownership protections may serve lawful privacy and commercial purposes. Excessive secrecy, however, can obstruct investigations into corruption, sanctions evasion, tax crimes, and other Financial Crimes.
Limited Liability Company Kvazar has become a case study because a relatively obscure Russian company became internationally significant after being connected to a foreign technology supply chain. Its designation shows that sanctions risk may arise from procurement activity even when classic laundering methods, such as cash placement, shell-bank transfers, or luxury-asset purchases, have not been publicly established.
The future of Limited Liability Company Kvazar remains uncertain. The company could remain registered but inactive, restructure under a new name, transfer operations to a related entity, or seek alternative suppliers in Russia or third countries. Any change in its name, director, shareholder, address, suppliers, or business activity would require renewed sanctions and Beneficial Ownership checks.
Dissolution would not eliminate historical compliance concerns. Banks, exporters, and investigators would still need to examine earlier transactions, related companies, successor entities, and former directors. A newly formed company using the same address, management, suppliers, customers, or payment channels could represent continuity despite having a different legal identity.
The reforms relevant to the Limited Liability Company Kvazar company structure include stronger beneficial-ownership verification, improved customs-data sharing, more effective end-user controls, tighter restrictions on dual-use electronics, and increased scrutiny of intermediary companies.
Businesses conducting sanctions screening for Russian companies should search exact and alternative names, registration numbers, tax IDs, directors, shareholders, addresses, suppliers, customers, shipping routes, and end users. In this case, relevant terms include Kvazar OOO, Limited Liability Company Kvazar, registration number 1197847145748, tax ID 7805753313, Elmec Trade OÜ, and Limited Liability Company Spetsvoltazh.
A critical principle is the separation of suspicion from proof. A sanctions designation is serious and operationally decisive, but it does not answer every question about ownership, criminal intent, or the movement of money. Future reporting should clearly identify confirmed information, alleged conduct, and unresolved issues.
Limited Liability Company Kvazar is a Saint Petersburg-registered Russian electronics importer incorporated in 2019. Its key corporate identifiers include registration number 1197847145748, tax ID 7805753313, and the legal name ООО «КВАЗАР». Russian business records identify a general director, but the ultimate beneficial owner has not been reliably established in the sources reviewed.
The company’s international relevance comes from its connection to Estonia-registered Elmec Trade OÜ and the importation of U.S.-manufactured electronic components. OFAC designated Limited Liability Company Kvazar under Executive Order 14024 as part of a wider effort to disrupt Russian sanctions circumvention and military-industrial procurement networks.
The available evidence supports a high sanctions and AML risk rating. It does not prove that Limited Liability Company Kvazar laundered criminal proceeds, concealed luxury assets, operated through an offshore company, or participated in a confirmed money-laundering network. No verified PEP connection, offshore leak, bank account, or criminal judgment involving Kvazar has been identified in the reviewed material.
The main lesson from the Limited Liability Company Kvazar Russia profile is that corporate transparency cannot be assessed through registration data alone. Effective oversight requires tracing ownership, payments, goods, intermediaries, and end users across jurisdictions.
Greater Beneficial Ownership disclosure, stronger export controls, better financial intelligence, and coordinated Regulatory Oversight can reduce the opportunities available to opaque companies. The Limited Liability Company Kvazar case demonstrates both the reach of modern sanctions enforcement and the limitations of public information when ownership and financial records are difficult to access.
