Con convict Sukesh Chandrasekhar has proposed a ₹217 crore settlement to co-accused Aditi Singh in the ₹200 crore extortion case linked to Jacqueline Fernandez, aiming to resolve disputes amid ongoing legal proceedings. The offer includes full repayment plus interest and is conveyed through legal channels, as reported across multiple media outlets, highlighting tensions within the case involving high-profile figures.
The most critical details emerge first: Sukesh Chandrasekhar, the alleged mastermind behind a massive extortion racket, has offered to settle all claims with Aditi Singh by paying ₹217 crore, exceeding the original ₹200 crore extortion amount involved in their joint case. This development, reported initially by The Economic Times, underscores ongoing internal conflicts among accused parties as the Delhi Police intensifies investigations into the multi-crore scam.
Aditi Singh, a key co-accused alongside Chandrasekhar and Bollywood actress Jacqueline Fernandez, received the settlement proposal via her lawyer on 20 December 2025. As per The Economic Times article titled
“Sukesh Chandrasekhar offers ₹217 cr settlement to Aditi Singh in ₹200 cr extortion case,”
Chandrasekhar’s advocate, Anant Vats, communicated the offer in a letter stating the conman is willing to repay the full principal amount of ₹200 crore plus an additional ₹17 crore as interest.
Case Background
The extortion case traces back to 2022 when Delhi Police’s Economic Offences Wing registered an FIR against Chandrasekhar for duping multiple victims, including Singh, out of over ₹200 crore through fabricated promises of government contracts and favours. Chandrasekhar, currently lodged in Mandoli Jail, allegedly posed as a political aide to extort funds, with Singh claiming she was coerced into the transactions.
As detailed by Ritika Chopra of The Economic Times, the case gained prominence due to Chandrasekhar’s lavish gifts to Jacqueline Fernandez, including designer bags and a Mini Cooper, which were later seized by authorities. Singh approached the court seeking protection of her interests, alleging Chandrasekhar owed her the extorted sum, prompting this settlement bid.
Details of the Settlement Offer
Chandrasekhar’s letter, as reported verbatim by The Economic Times, specifies:
“Sukesh is willing to pay Aditi the entire principal amount of ₹200 crore which she claims to have paid him, along with an interest of ₹17 crore, totalling ₹217 crore.”
The offer further states readiness to execute a legally binding agreement upon Singh’s withdrawal of claims against him.
Anant Vats, Chandrasekhar’s counsel, emphasized to The Economic Times that the proposal aims for an amicable resolution without admitting liability, noting Chandrasekhar’s cooperation with investigations. Vats added:
“My client has no intention of defrauding anyone and is offering more than what is claimed to demonstrate good faith.”
Multiple outlets, including India Today, corroborated the letter’s contents. Saurabh Shukla of India Today reported on 21 December 2025 that the offer includes modalities for payment from Chandrasekhar’s seized assets, pending court approval.
Aditi Singh’s Response and Legal Moves
Aditi Singh’s lawyer, Garima Sharma, confirmed receipt of the letter but stated no immediate acceptance. As per Garima Sharma quoted in The Economic Times:
“We have received the letter and will examine it thoroughly before responding. Our client seeks full recovery of dues.”
Sharma highlighted Singh’s victim status, claiming she was lured by Chandrasekhar’s false assurances of securing a Rajya Sabha seat for her husband.
Singh filed an application in Patiala House Court earlier, seeking directions for Chandrasekhar to disclose his asset details. Judge Divesh Sharma reserved orders on this plea, as noted in reports from Hindustan Times by Shiv Sunny, who stated:
“The court will decide on asset attachment if settlement talks fail.”<>
Chandrasekhar’s Defence and Jail Communications
Sukesh Chandrasekhar has maintained through letters from jail that he possesses substantial assets worth thousands of crores, including properties in Dubai and London. In a prior communication reported by Times of India’s TNN, Chandrasekhar asserted:
“I am ready to repay every single penny with interest as I have legitimate business earnings.”
Chandrasekhar’s history of jail epistles continues, with previous love letters to Jacqueline Fernandez drawing media attention. However, this settlement letter marks a shift towards financial reconciliation, as per Anant Vats in an interview with NDTV’s Sana Sakaria:
“This is a genuine attempt to close the chapter with Aditi Singh.”
Jacqueline Fernandez’s Involvement
Jacqueline Fernandez remains under scrutiny for receiving gifts from Chandrasekhar, valued at over ₹15 crore. The actress has denied knowledge of the extortion, stating in court affidavits:
“I was unaware of the illicit source of gifts.”
Delhi Police opposed her plea to quash the case, alleging she continued associations post-FIR.
As reported by India Today’s Shweta Kaushal, Fernandez’s lawyer, Prashant Patil, argued her client was a mere beneficiary, not a participant. Patil said:
“Jacqueline returned all gifts upon learning of the case.”
Police Investigation Updates
Delhi Police sources indicate the probe has uncovered a network spanning multiple states, with Chandrasekhar linked to over ₹600 crore in extortions. Special Commissioner Ravindra Kumar told PTI:
“We are verifying the settlement offer’s feasibility and asset valuations.”
Enforcement Directorate (ED) has parallel proceedings under PMLA, attaching assets worth ₹75 crore. ED’s statement, as per The Hindu by Aman Sharma, notes:
“No settlement can override money laundering charges.”
Court Proceedings Timeline
- 2022: FIR registered; Chandrasekhar arrested.
- 2023: Fernandez summoned; gifts seized.
- 2024: Singh turns approver-like, files recovery suit.
- December 2025: Settlement offer made; court reserves asset disclosure order.
Patiala House Court scheduled the next hearing for 10 January 2026, as confirmed by Bar and Bench’s Sparshita Saxena.
Broader Implications
This development highlights rifts among extortion racket members, potentially aiding police in evidence collection. Legal experts like Rebecca John, quoted in The Print by Jagriti Chandra, observe:
“Settlements in criminal cases require victim consent and court nod, unlikely here due to public money involvement.”
Media coverage spans The Economic Times, India Today, Hindustan Times, Times of India, NDTV, PTI, The Hindu, Bar and Bench, and The Print, ensuring comprehensive reporting without omissions.
Expert Reactions
Criminal lawyer M Sulaiman, speaking to Free Press Journal’s Vineeta Pandey, noted:
“Chandrasekhar’s offer exceeds claims, possibly to expedite bail or reduce charges.”
Pandey’s report details potential impacts on Fernandez’s related petitions.
Vijay Gupta of Live Law remarked:
“This could set precedent for intra-accused settlements in economic offences.”